Why “No Harm Intended” Backfires in Healthcare AI: Intent Has Never Protected Healthcare Organizations in Litigation
AI governance & safety, Healthcare Systems & Risk Anne Fredriksson AI governance & safety, Healthcare Systems & Risk Anne Fredriksson

Why “No Harm Intended” Backfires in Healthcare AI: Intent Has Never Protected Healthcare Organizations in Litigation

Healthcare has always been judged by outcomes, not intent. As AI systems enter clinical and mental health environments, the same legal standards apply. This article explains why ‘no harm intended’ backfires in healthcare AI and how liability is actually determined.

Read More
Healthcare’s Long Memory
Healthcare Systems & Risk, Institutional Memory, Human risk in technology, AI governance & safety, Founder and Investor Intelligence, Trust Ethics and Responsible Innovation Anne Fredriksson Healthcare Systems & Risk, Institutional Memory, Human risk in technology, AI governance & safety, Founder and Investor Intelligence, Trust Ethics and Responsible Innovation Anne Fredriksson

Healthcare’s Long Memory

Healthcare doesn’t meet new technology with a blank slate. It meets it with memory.
From EHR rollouts to today’s AI tools, institutional trauma shapes how clinicians interpret, resist, or quietly reject innovation. This piece explores why adoption failures are rarely technical problems and how founders and investors who ignore human and organizational memory underestimate one of the biggest risk factors in health and mental-health tech.

Read More